docs: anonymise project asset names in source comments

Measured figures are kept; only the studio-specific level and asset
names are generalised, and the Perforce rationale is reworded to
describe the class of setups rather than this one project.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>

Source/AssetUsageAuditEditor/Private/AssetUsageAuditSettings.cpp

@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ UAssetUsageAuditSettings::UAssetUsageAuditSettings()
     // third-party, so leaving these in makes the first run unreadable for an artist looking for
     // their own content.
     //
-    // Deliberately NOT excluded, despite being a bought pack: Content/MenuSystemPro. It supplies
-    // BP_MenuSystemGameInstance, which DefaultEngine.ini names as the project's GameInstance.
+    // Deliberately NOT excluded, despite being a bought pack: Content/a purchased UI pack. It supplies
+    // BP_MenuGameInstance, which DefaultEngine.ini names as the project's GameInstance.
     // Excluding it would hide a load-bearing asset from every report.
     ExcludedPackagePaths = {
         TEXT("Content/3rdParty"),

Source/AssetUsageAuditEditor/Private/SAssetUsageAuditPanel.cpp

@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ void SAssetUsageAuditPanel::Construct(const FArguments& InArgs)
                         }
 
                         // Name the level when there is one, count them when there are several:
-                        // a button reading "WP_Main" is worth more than one reading "1 level".
+                        // a button reading "WP_Example" is worth more than one reading "1 level".
                         if (LevelFilters.Num() == 1)
                         {
                             return FText::FromString(FPackageName::GetShortName(*LevelFilters.CreateConstIterator()));